Comparative characteristics of Limb Rescue Center patients with diabetic foot syndrome and type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
https://doi.org/10.62751/2713-0177-2025-6-4-02
Abstract
Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is a significant medical and social problem. Despite modern prevention and treatment options, as well as patient routing, DFS remains one of the dominant causes of lower limb amputation and leads to disability in patients with both type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) diabetes mellitus.
The aim. To compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with DM1 (n = 30) and DM2 (n = 729) hospitalized at the Limb Rescue Center of the V.P. Demikhov State Clinical Hospital in the period from 2019 to 2020.
Materials and methods. Anamnestic and clinical laboratory data from 759 electronic medical records of patients of the limb rescue center, patients with DM1 or DM2, were analyzed.
Results. The majority of patients with DM1 were 45–60 years old – 56.67% (n = 17), with DM2 – elderly (50.75%, n = 370). The median fasting plasma glucose upon admission in patients with DM1 was 11.5 [6.2; 14.7] mmol/L, in patients with DM2 – 9.9 [7.2; 13.8] mmol/L. The average HbA1c in group 1 was 8.71 ± 0.26 (95% CI: 8.18 – 9.25 in patients with DM2 – 7.8 [6.7; 9.1]%. The mean GFR was 65.92 ± 3.43 (95% CI: 58.88 – 60.57) ml/min/1.73 m2 and 63.38 ± 0.90 (95% CI: 61.62 – 65.15) ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively, in groups 1 and 2. The structure of ulcerative necrotic lesions in patients with DM1 was dominated by ulcer (33.33%, n = 10) and purulent/purulent-destructive arthritis (26.6%, n = 8), and in patients with DM2 - gangrene (33.47%, n = 244) and ulcer (25.1%, n = 183). Amputation occurred in 36.67% (n = 11) of patients with DM1 and in 24.3% (n = 372) of patients with DM2.
Conclusions. The identified features of patients with DFS and DM1 and DM2, along with the data obtained on the relatively high frequency of amputations in both groups, indicate the need to optimize patient routing algorithms and increase the attention of patients with both DM1 and DM2 to the importance of foot care and regular visits to the diabetic foot office.
About the Authors
V. V. TitovaRussian Federation
Victoria V. Titova – assistant of the department of endocrinology medical faculty
Moscow
A. S. Teplova
Russian Federation
Anna S. Teplova – Assistant of the Department of Endocrinology
Moscow
T. T. Mayarbieva
Russian Federation
Tanzila T. Mayarbieva – Assistant of the Department of Endocrinology of the Department of Endocrinology
Moscow
References
1. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Майоров А.Ю., Мокрышева Н.Г., Андреева Е.Н., Безлепкина О.Б. с соавт. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. Под редакцией И.И. Дедова, М.В. Шестаковой, А.Ю. Майорова. 11-й выпуск. Сахарный диабет. 2023;26(S2):1–157. doi: 10.14341/DM13042.
2. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Викулова О.К., Железнякова А.В., Исаков М.А., Сазонова Д.В., Мокрышева Н.Г. Сахарный диабет в Российской Федерации: динамика эпидемиологических показателей по данным Федерального регистра сахарного диабета за период 2010–2022 гг. Сахарный диабет. 2023;26(2):104–123. doi: 10.14341/DM13035
3. Галстян Г.Р., Артемова Е.В., Бардюгов П.С., Бондаренко О.Н., Джемилова З.Н., Доронина Л.П. с соавт. Спасение нижних конечностей у больных сахарным диабетом: невозможное возможно. Сахарный диабет. 2025;28(1):56–67. doi: 10.14341/DM13245.
4. Amini MR, Sanjari M, Mohajeri Tehrani MR, Nasli E, Yazdanpanah L, Mousavi Z et al. Evaluation of foot self-care status and foot screening problems in patients with diabetes in Iran: A national multicenter study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2023;23(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01401-7.
5. Alotaibi A, Alqhtani N, Alluhaymid A, Alhomaidan L, Alwabel M, Algurafi A et al. Awareness of diabetic patients in the Qassim Region about diabetic foot and its complications. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e52306. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52306.
6. Taksande BA, Thote M, Jajoo UN. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of foot care in patients with diabetes at central rural India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017;6(2):284–87. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.219994.
7. Redondo MJ, Hagopian WA, Oram R, Steck AK, Vehik K, Weedon M et al. The clinical consequences of heterogeneity within and between different diabetes types. Diabetologia. 2020;63(10):2040–48. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05211-7.
8. Oropallo A, Lantis J, Martin A, Al Rubaiay A, Wang N. Wound care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Improving outcomes through the integration of telemedicine. J Wound Care. 2021;30(Suppl2):S12–S17. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup2.S12.
9. Rossboth S, Lechleitner M, Oberaigner W. Risk factors for diabetic foot complications in type 2 diabetes – a systematic review. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020;4(1):e00175. doi: 10.1002/edm2.175.
10. Anichini R, Cosentino C, Papanas N. Diabetic foot syndrome in the COVID-19 era: How to move from classical to new approaches. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2022;21(2):107–10. doi: 10.1177/15347346221081572.
11. Elmehraoui O, Berrabeh S, Messaoudi N, Derkaoui N, Zerrouki D, Rouf S, Latrech H. Monitoring of type 2 diabetic patients during the 'Covid 19' pandemic by teleconsultation. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;78:103689. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103689.
Review
For citations:
Titova V.V., Teplova A.S., Mayarbieva T.T. Comparative characteristics of Limb Rescue Center patients with diabetic foot syndrome and type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. FOCUS. Endocrinology. 2025;6(4):12-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.62751/2713-0177-2025-6-4-02
JATS XML















